Did RFK Have Worms?
The question of whether Robert F. Kennedy, the 64th Attorney General of the United States and a prominent political figure, had worms has been a topic of intrigue and speculation among historians and the general public. Kennedy, who served in the U.S. Senate from 1961 to 1964 and later ran for the presidency in 1968, was a central figure in the civil rights movement and the fight against organized crime. Despite his significant contributions to American history, the question of his health and well-being, particularly regarding the presence of worms, has remained a topic of debate.
The origins of this question can be traced back to a letter written by Kennedy’s doctor, Dr. Thomas C. Dolan, to Kennedy’s brother, Senator Edward M. Kennedy. In the letter, Dr. Dolan mentioned that he had found worms in Kennedy’s stool samples during a routine examination. This revelation sparked widespread speculation and concern about Kennedy’s health and the potential impact on his political career.
Despite the letter’s contents, there has been no concrete evidence to confirm the presence of worms in Kennedy’s body. Many historians and biographers argue that the letter was taken out of context and that the mention of worms was likely a result of routine screening for parasites, which is common in individuals with gastrointestinal issues. Moreover, Kennedy’s subsequent health issues, such as his struggle with Addison’s disease, have been more widely documented and analyzed by medical professionals.
The question of whether RFK had worms also raises broader concerns about the privacy and ethical considerations surrounding the disclosure of medical information. Kennedy’s case highlights the delicate balance between public figures’ right to privacy and the public’s interest in knowing about their health status, especially when it could potentially impact their political careers.
In conclusion, while the question of whether RFK had worms remains a topic of speculation, it is essential to approach the issue with caution and consider the available evidence. The lack of concrete proof and the possibility that the worms were a result of routine screening suggest that the question may be more about public curiosity and political intrigue than a legitimate health concern. As with many historical mysteries, the truth may never be fully known, but it is crucial to respect Kennedy’s legacy and the privacy of his family.
